A bold humanitarian initiative aimed at breaking the Israeli blockade on Gaza has been met with a sweeping crackdown by Egyptian authorities, sparking global condemnation and raising questions about Egypt’s role in the ongoing crisis.
The “Global March to Gaza,” which drew over 4,000 activists from more than 80 countries, was intended as a peaceful demonstration of solidarity with Palestinians suffering under siege.
Instead, it became a flashpoint for repression, detentions, and diplomatic tension.
A Movement Stifled Before It Could Begin
The march was scheduled to begin in Cairo, with participants traveling by bus to the city of al-Arish in northern Sinai, then walking 50 kilometers to the Rafah border crossing—the last remaining gateway into Gaza.
Organizers emphasized the march’s nonviolent, apolitical nature, describing it as a grassroots call for justice, dignity, and humanitarian access.
However, Egyptian authorities swiftly moved to dismantle the effort. Activists were detained at airports, hotels, and checkpoints.
Passports were confiscated, and many were interrogated or deported. Reports emerged of plainclothes officers shadowing participants, riot police encircling peaceful sit-ins, and even physical assaults on demonstrators. In one chilling account, masked men attacked marchers with whips under the cover of darkness, leaving several injured.
International Voices Silenced
Among those targeted were citizens from the U.S., Europe, North Africa, and Australia. Delegations from Tunisia and Libya were blocked at borders, while others were forcibly returned to their home countries.
Despite the repression, many participants refused to back down. Sit-ins erupted in Ismailia, and impromptu strategy meetings were held in hotel lobbies. The spirit of resistance, organizers say, only grew stronger.
One Turkish activist described the ordeal as “psychological warfare,” while others accused Egypt of acting under Israeli pressure.
“We were treated as insurgents, not humanitarians,” said Abdulkuddus Yalçın, a prominent voice in the movement. “But the fact that we were stopped physically does not mean we were stopped morally.”
Egypt’s Justification and Global Reactions
Egypt defended its actions by citing national security concerns, particularly in the volatile Sinai region. Officials insisted that any gatherings near the Rafah crossing must be pre-approved and coordinated with the government.
Critics, however, argue that the crackdown reflects a broader pattern of suppressing dissent and shielding Israel from international scrutiny.
The response has drawn sharp criticism from human rights groups and foreign governments. Some embassies were accused of being slow to assist detained nationals, while others quietly acknowledged Egypt’s right to enforce its laws.
The United Nations and humanitarian organizations have yet to issue formal statements, but pressure is mounting.
A Symbolic Victory Amid Setbacks
Though the march was physically halted, its message has reverberated across the globe. Social media campaigns, virtual rallies, and renewed calls for action have kept the spotlight on Gaza’s humanitarian crisis.
Organizers vow to regroup and return—possibly by sea or through new diplomatic channels.
As one marcher put it, “They can block our path, but they can’t block our purpose.”
.jpg)
.jpg)
0 Comments